TAO makes TAO waste! Messari researcher dissects Bittensor's network effects
Original article: "Breaking Down Bittensor's Network Effects" Author: Seth Bloomberg (Messari Researcher) Compiled: Zombie Messari Researcher Seth Bloomberg recently published an article on X, detailing the network effects of Bittensor and potential bottlenecks for future development.
The following is the original compilation:
Due to the recent discussions about Bittensor, I would like to share my views and some concerns about it.
Thanks to Saypien (former Messari executive) for the extensive discussion on this topic, and also thanks to Sami Kassab (former Messari researcher), I know he will come to point out my mistakes here.
A basic layer network must establish network effects to succeed, in order to attract and retain users and developers. For smart contract platforms like Ethereum, network effects come from on chain liquidity and stable execution capabilities. For Bittensor, its current network effects come from:
1) Familiar with AI/ML developers who mine on the internet (i.e. developers who create AI models and services);
2) A deep liquidity TAO market that can absorb the selling pressure of tokens. Usually, less mature networks are more susceptible to token selling pressure.
Due to the widespread applicability of (2) to most encrypted networks, I will primarily focus on (1). Specifically, the network effect or flywheel effect generated by (1) is as follows: the new subnet benefits from experienced AI/ML Bittensor developers who continuously produce high-quality results → AI/ML engineers benefit from continuous TAO token issuances. It can be expected that the revenue from TAO tokens, combined with Bittensor's AI/ML talent, will continue to attract more subnet builders, thereby attracting more AI/ML talent and forming a cycle.
Whether you are bearish or bullish on TAO, it is worth exploring how this network effect may collapse. So, let's get started.
Scenario 1: TAO token revenue<operating expenses
AI/ML talents are attracted to the internet because the TAO token returns they receive exceed their operating costs on Bittensor. Mathematics is simple: there is no need to raise a large amount of funds, acquire customers, or generate income. Just integrate the model into Bittensor's subnet and earn TAO token issuance revenue. The assumption of this model is that your earnings (based on current or expected TAO value) should be able to cover your expenses denominated in US dollars. If this account is not established, AI/ML talents will choose to leave Bittensor and seek other opportunities.
Scenario 2: Opportunity Cost Calculation
Imagine you are a skilled AI/ML developer on Bittensor, or you are a small team of two or three AI/ML developers building projects on Bittensor. At some point, you have to ask yourself: 'What is the opportunity cost of continuing to be a miner here?' Well, you know the upside benefits of staying on Bittensor only come from the issuance of TAO tokens and the rise in TAO token prices. With the benefits on this side, you also need to consider the other side: whether creating a new protocol without Bittensor can bring greater benefits? I know... this may be considered 'blasphemy' for some people, but if you don't consider this, then you're not taking responsibility for yourself.
Bittensor has realized the need to provide additional incentive benefits for subnets and their miners. 'Dynamic TAO' seems to be their approved solution.
It is currently running on the testing network, so it is likely to be launched by the end of this year or early next year. Through dynamic TAO, each subnet will have a fund pool similar to Uniswap V2, which will pair and price subnet tokens with TAO. The 'dynamic' aspect of this upgrade lies in the new dynamic TAO token issuance model: the more TAOs pledged in the fund pool, the more TAO tokens allocated to subnets, and the higher the price of subnet tokens. It sounds very cost-effective. AI developers can gain appreciation of subnet tokens while retaining their advantage in the Bittensor ecosystem (i.e. TAO token issuance).
However, pairing subnet tokens with TAO for pricing will set an "artificial upper limit" on the valuation of individual subnet tokens. Ethereum and its L2 or Helium and its subDAOs also have similar token dynamic relationships. This is where opportunity cost calculation comes into play. If you are one of these powerful AI/ML developers or subnet owners, why limit yourself in the way mentioned above? Why not just establish your own protocol or network? I dare say that some venture capitalists may be eager to fund you after seeing a bunch of mediocre AI and encryption projects, and this valuation may be higher than a rigorously designed subnet. Or even better, you have accumulated a large amount of TAO during mining, and after calculation, you believe that you can self fund to establish your own protocol, attract some applications, users, and revenue, and then consider external funding (which is rare today).
In my opinion, this is the long-term challenge Bittensor needs to face - designing mechanisms, incentives, and ecosystems to retain the best AI/ML talent.
I think a recent tweet from mrink0 (Delphi Digital researcher) also hinted at this issue (if not, please forgive me for taking it out of context; if there is an error, please correct me). In my opinion, people like Nous (open-source AI research organization Nous Research) leaving Bittensor to build their own networks indicate that for some Bittensor developers, the incentive to stay in Bittensor is currently not enough to compete with building and publishing their own networks.
Addendum:
After mrink0, in Seth Bloomberg's comment section, he pointed out that he agrees with most of Seth Bloomberg's views and stated that the key challenge will be whether Bittensor can attract a model that can solve the problem of people being willing to pay. Otherwise, it will only be (temporary) token emissions.
Seth Bloomberg gave the following response to this:
Even if the model solves the problem of people being willing to pay, miners may not necessarily benefit from it in any way. People will pay for applications or products that use these models, but the protocol does not define any mechanism for miners to share these benefits. The worst-case scenario is that the demand for miners increases (inference costs rise), but they are unable to generate any income from these applications or products. The income of Bittensor miners cannot increase with the demand or revenue of the applications they serve.
(责任编辑:经济数据)
-
2. 近两年国内市场火起来的另一个概念则是——场景化服务,是指通过各种手段将用户进行精确分类并聚集到一起,然后针对分类好的用户搭建其能引起他们共鸣的场景,使得用户不再对相...[详细]
-
如果你想为了解决基本内容搜索引擎(SEO)问题而浏览网页,可以适当地使用head标签和meta描述。...[详细]
-
客单价略高,菜品口味一般 雕爷牛腩客单价区间在150到200元之间,这个价位其实属于中档餐饮的价格了,但是雕爷牛腩的口味对比同类竞品并没有十分鲜明的特色,这就导致消费者期望过高,与实际体验形成落...[详细]
-
从最开始的分层用户测试和数据验证,到游戏玩法调整、商业化策略,双平台结合平台用户特性,用大数据给予项目组积极的支持和专业的建议; 整个限号不删档期间,应用宝进行了持续的精细化导量,为王者荣耀带来了大...[详细]
-
内容创业很火,我准备辞职创业了?先看看自己的执行力如何,比如每天写一篇文章? 文/守护袁昆,湖北企业网络营销、SEO优化、微电商实战顾问,自媒体。...[详细]
-
“求同”、“求新”、“求美”、“求名”本是消费者正常消费心理,但是消费者这种心理反应如果很容易被营销...[详细]
-
活动前瞻 04 期|星洲盛事:新加坡 Token2049 领衔 9 月 9 日至 23 日全球 Web 3.0 活动精选
摘要:霎时间,孵化器太多创业者不够用了! 从1978年改革开放以来,房地产行业已经轰轰烈烈的发展了近40年的时间。...[详细]
-
以太币平台芝麻交易所交易所下载-芝麻交易所去中心化v6.5.7官方授权下载
虎扑体育2013年、2014年及2015年计入当期损益政府补助金额分别254.65万、363.98万及680.12万,分别占同期税前利润14.57%、44.02%及19.76%。...[详细]
-
BankSocial 首席执行官在 Ripple 会议后表示,“你对 XRP 的设想还不够宏大,应该将其放大 1,000,000,000 倍”
三、干点有价值的事 守护袁昆认为干点有价值的事很重要,现在各行业都有机会、各行业都有竞争,既然如此,我们何不干点有价值的事? 比如现在流行的共享单车,虽然比较火,但个人认为根本不是强需求,不算...[详细]
-
贾跃亭野心再燃:宣布FF完成3000万美元融资 2025年将推两款平价电动车
” 以下,来自当天他对100多位CEO的演讲: 刚才主持人说他错过了新东方上市前的内部股认购。...[详细]